<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.156 (http://www.squarespace.com) on Sun, 19 May 2013 08:51:05 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Your HR Resource Blog</title><link>http://www.yourhrresource.com/blog/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:14:50 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.156 (http://www.squarespace.com)</generator><item><title>New I-9 Effective 5-8-13</title><category>Form I-9</category><category>I-9</category><category>I-9 Central</category><category>I-9 webinars</category><category>New I-9</category><category>USCIS</category><category>immigration</category><dc:creator>Laura Moxley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:31:42 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.yourhrresource.com/blog/2013/3/21/new-i-9-effective-5-8-13.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1006113:13350721:33091706</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>On March 8, 2013, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service updated and published a revised Employment Eligibility Verification Form I-9 (<a href="http://www.yourhrresource.com/free_forms/">visit our free forms to download</a>). Employers should begin using the revised Form I-9 immediately for all new hires and all re-verifications.</p>
<p><strong>Effective May 8, 2013, employers will be <span style="text-decoration: underline;">REQUIRED</span> to use the revised Form I-9 and could face penalties if found to not be using it. Prior versions of Form I-9 will not be accepted after May 7, 2013.</strong></p>
<p><em>What&rsquo;s New about the form?</em><em><br /></em></p>
<p>&bull;&nbsp;Adding data fields, including the employee&rsquo;s foreign passport information (if applicable) and telephone and e-mail addresses.<br />&bull;&nbsp;Improving the form&rsquo;s instructions.<br />&bull;&nbsp;Revising the layout of the form, and expanding the form from one to two pages (not including the form instructions and the List of Acceptable Documents).</p>
<p><em>How should HR prepare for the new form?</em></p>
<p>&bull;&nbsp;Assign a team member to spearhead the transition to the new form.<br />&bull;&nbsp;Familiarize yourself and your team with changes to the form; this is a good time to also review Form I-9 requirements, in general, to ensure your organization understands the requirements for each section as they relate to regulations.<br />&bull;&nbsp;Identify areas where business processes may need revising.<br />&bull;&nbsp;Partner with your electronic I-9 software developers to ensure a smooth implementation of the new form so that you are up and running effective May 8, 2013.</p>
<p><em>What should HR be doing anyway?</em></p>
<p>&bull;&nbsp;Form I-9 is only required for all employees hired after November 6, 1986.<br />&bull;&nbsp;The Form I-9 must be completed AND dated within 3 business days after the employee&rsquo;s hire date. They cannot complete it until AFTER they have received and accepted a conditional offer of employment. Use an Offer Letter to document this was the case.<br />&bull;&nbsp;The employer must examine the original documents, not photo copies, to ascertain if they are genuine. <br />&bull;&nbsp;The employer cannot TELL the employee WHAT documents to bring for examination. A list of documents is provided on the Form I-9. Give this list to the employee so they can choose what documents they have that satisfy the requirements. <br />&bull;&nbsp;All documents must be UNEXPIRED!<br />&bull;&nbsp;Section 1 is completed by the employee and signed and dated.<br />&bull;&nbsp;Section 2 is completed by the employer and signed and dated. This should be the SAME person who examined the original documents. Within the &ldquo;Certification&rdquo; paragraph, there is a blank line to insert the employee&rsquo;s hire date. This is often left blank. Be sure to complete this and ensure it is the correct hire date that was used on the Offer Letter.<br />&bull;&nbsp;Section 3 is ONLY for RE-verification so this is left blank UNTIL it is time to RE-verify the employee&rsquo;s documents. You should have some type of tickler/reminder system in place for Form I-9 re-verifications. Every document must maintain an unexpired date, including Driver&rsquo;s Licenses.<br />&bull;&nbsp;Store the I-9s separate from the Personnel Files. A binder is a good method. Use alphabetical dividers for organization. Keep the binders locked. Electronic storage and signatures are allowed.<br />&bull;&nbsp;Remember the retention for I-9s is the duration of employment PLUS one year OR 3 years from the date of hire, whichever is longer. It is not necessary to keep I-9s beyond the retention period.</p>
<p>USCIS has scheduled <a href="http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=413628ac1dc0c210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&amp;vgnextchannel=413628ac1dc0c210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD">free webinars</a> to help employers learn about the new form.&nbsp; Visit <a href="http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=84c267ee5cb38210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&amp;vgnextchannel=84c267ee5cb38210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD">I-9 Central Home</a> for more information. Thank you.</p>
<p>This information has been provided by <a href="http://www.yourhrresource.com">Your HR Resource</a>.&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourhrresource.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-33091706.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Health Plan Solutions under the ACA</title><category>ACA</category><category>Health &amp; Wellness</category><category>health insurance</category><category>pay or play</category><dc:creator>Laura Moxley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 17:22:12 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.yourhrresource.com/blog/2013/2/28/health-plan-solutions-under-the-aca.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1006113:13350721:32897359</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (aka ACA) is moving forward. Effective 2014, the Act will require all individuals in the United States to have some form of health insurance. Referred to as mandates, this provision will impact all employers with 50 or more full time equivalent employees, known as &ldquo;pay or play&rdquo;. Essentially, employers with 50 or more full time equivalent employees may be faced with penalties if the employer:</p>
<p>&nbsp;<br /><strong>a)</strong> does not offer coverage and at least one employee receives a premium tax credit or cost sharing subsidy in an Exchange; or</p>
<p>&nbsp;<br /><strong>b)</strong> the employer does offer coverage but it is not affordable to the employee and therefore the employee chooses coverage through an Exchange and receives a premium tax credit.</p>
<p><br />The question I am most often asked is what can an employer do who has fewer than 50 full time equivalent employees? First, no matter how many employees a company has, employers understand that offering a benefits package that includes health and wellness provides a competitive marketplace advantage by attracting and retaining talent. Next, if you are an employer with 50 or more full time equivalent employees, do not let the penalties frighten you because you do still have choices in the healthcare you offer your employees. Employers with fewer than 50 employees have choices too. While this employer may not be subject to penalties associated with &ldquo;pay or play&rdquo;, other aspects of the ACA will affect your plan, should you offer one.</p>
<p><strong>Consider the below ACA requirements that affect all plans, some of which are already in effect:</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>Modified Community Rating: cannot charge more based on serious medical conditions </li>
<li>Deductible Maximums: PPO plans will be capped at $2,000 deductibles&nbsp; </li>
<li>Medical Loss Rebate (MLR) Checks: if an insurance company spends less than 80% of premiums on medical care and quality, it must rebate the portion of premium dollars that exceeded this limit</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>What if&hellip;</strong></p>
<p>You had a unique opportunity to:</p>
<p><strong>a)</strong> have the required coverage the ACA mandates; and<br /><strong>b)</strong> retain some control over your health plan design!</p>
<p>Your HR Resource offers plans that provide complete flexibility to build your own customized plan, avoid some of the ACA mandates, offer wellness incentives to your employees and continue to manage your plans in a way that is affordable for you and your employees.</p>
<p><strong>What does that mean for you?</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>You will not be lumped into one risk pool, giving your plans the flexibility to be rated on how well your plan is performing!</li>
<li>You will not be limited to low deductibles, giving your plans the flexibility to offer deductibles higher than $2000 which helps reduce premiums!</li>
<li>You will not have to worry about administering MLR checks which, for small employers, end up costing more than the paper they are written on!</li>
</ol>
<p>Your HR Resource is an employee benefits and HR consulting firm specializing in Employee Health &amp; Wellness Benefits, Employee Relations, Anti-discrimination training, Employee Complaint Investigations, Policies &amp; Procedures, Payroll Administration, Drug Testing, Background Checks, and Compliance.</p>
<p><br />To learn more, contact Laura Moxley, SPHR, with Your HR Resource, at</p>
<p>405-360-2160 or <a href="mailto:laura@yourhrresource.com">laura@yourhrresource.com</a>.&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourhrresource.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-32897359.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Business Seminar Series - Top 10 Must Haves for your Employee Handbook - May 30th, 2012</title><category>Business Seminar</category><category>Employee Handbook</category><category>Employee Handbook</category><category>Human Resources</category><category>Risk Management</category><dc:creator>Laura Moxley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 21:17:59 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.yourhrresource.com/blog/2012/5/18/business-seminar-series-top-10-must-haves-for-your-employee.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1006113:13350721:16334080</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>This class will examine why it is necessary to have an employee handbook,  primarily focusing on the TOP TEN items that should be included in every  effective handbook using supporting examples of case law. Attendees will learn  what subtopics should be included in each item and will receive a sample EEO  Statement and AntiDiscrimination&nbsp;&nbsp; Policy for their practical application on  the job.</p>
<ul>
<li>Effective Handbooks</li>
<li>Latest Updates</li>
<li>Must-Have Policies</li>
<li>New Drug Testing Law</li>
<li>Sample Policies:   
<ul>
<li>EEO Statement</li>
<li>Anti-Discrimination Policy&nbsp;</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Class Taught by:</p>
<p><strong>Laura Moxley, SPHR&nbsp;</strong>is Founder and President of Your HR  Resource, a Norman-based human resources and benefits consulting company.</p>
<p>Your HR Resource specializes in Health Benefits, Employee Handbooks, Employee  Relations, Compliance, Anti-discrimination training, Employee Complaint  Investigations, and Payroll Administration. Laura has over 15 years of human  resources experience serving much of that time as HR Director for a large  privately held company. Laura earned a BA from the University of Oklahoma, has a  Professional Certificate in Human Resource Management, and is certified as a  Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR) through the Society of Human  Resource Management (SHRM).&nbsp;She is also a licensed health insurance  producer.</p>
<p>Laura frequently speaks to groups on various HR topics and currently serves  as Director of the Oklahoma State Council for Human Resource Management.</p>
<p>Laura also currently serves on the State Chamber HR Committee and the  Governor's Council for Workforce and Economic Development. In 2010, Laura was  named as one of "50 Making a Difference" by the Journal Record's Woman of the  Year program. The program recognizes Oklahoma women for leadership in business  and service to their communities. <a href="http://www.yourhrresource.com">www.yourhrresource.com</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://events.r20.constantcontact.com/register/event?llr=8yczazcab&amp;oeidk=a07e5xioh5ia880b4e4">REGISTER  NOW by CLICKING HERE</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourhrresource.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-16334080.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Workers Compensation Total Cost of Risk</title><category>Cost of Risk</category><category>Workers Compensation</category><category>risk</category><category>workcomp</category><category>workers compensation</category><dc:creator>Laura Moxley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.yourhrresource.com/blog/2011/8/22/workers-compensation-total-cost-of-risk.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1006113:13350721:13945426</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div><a href="http://s3.media.squarespace.com/production/1006113/13350721/-xm4VXyEwwb0/TlKOeFm13bI/AAAAAAAAAEU/ZcajkHmoOCw/s1600/Chris%252BMoxley.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5643729930600963506" style="margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; width: 214px; height: 320px; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://s3.media.squarespace.com/production/1006113/13350721/-xm4VXyEwwb0/TlKOeFm13bI/AAAAAAAAAEU/ZcajkHmoOCw/s320/Chris%252BMoxley.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a>
<div><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-2eUWMonU3go/TlKOY9eusqI/AAAAAAAAAEM/WTxZp97ki2o/s1600/Chris%2BMoxley2.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"></a>
<div><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-zepZsZciIbY/TlKOJzoCliI/AAAAAAAAAEE/GGlTrxdxS_s/s1600/Chris%2BMoxley2.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"></a>
<div>The term &ldquo;iceberg effect&rdquo; in the insurance world refers to hidden claims dollars. When considering the cost of a workers&rsquo; compensation claim, what usually first comes to mind is the initial cost of the claim. However, what most may not know is that when a claim is incurred, it affects several factors that all equate to dollars and impact the employer&rsquo;s bottom line. These are referred to as indirect claims costs. OSHA has spent considerable time and resources in researching what these dollars actually are.  According to the study, the smaller the claim, the higher the percentages of the indirect costs associated with that claim.  This makes sense as there is a common cost in setting up a claim, doing associated paperwork, etc. for all claims and this would certainly cost more as a percentage for smaller claims.
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>According to the study, for claims under $3000, the indirect costs are 4.5 times the amount of the claim, they are 1.6 times the amount of the claim for claims between $3,000 to $5000, and 1.2 times the amount of the claim for claims between $5000 and $10,000; finally for claims about $10,000, they are 1.1 times the amount of the claim.  Even though it is fairly easy to spreadsheet these numbers, <a href="http://www.osha.gov/dcsp/smallbusiness/safetypays/estimator.html">there is a worksheet on OSHA.com</a> that does the work for you.  It even goes a step further to show you what sales are needed to cover your claims.  When our agency has completed these in the past for clients, they are very surprised when you show them the numbers, but the amount of sales to cover the claim is where it really hits home.  Here is an example using a small to medium sized company with a workers&rsquo; comp premium of $80,000.  If they had two $20,000 losses that year, it would cost them $21,000 in additional premium over the next 3 years and $44,000 in indirect costs which would total over $65,000 in total costs.  When calculated like this, it is really just like you are self-insuring because the amount the claim ends up costing your company exceeds the initial claim amount. In the above example, the original claim was $40,000 yet it cost the company over $65,000.   If you operate on a 3% margin, which is standard for manufacturing companies, this would take over $14,000,000 in sales to replace these 2 losses in that same 3 year period. Keep in mind, most of these costs are incurred in the first year.</p>
<p>What makes up these soft costs or indirect costs?  Loss of use, loss of productivity, lost customers, damage to brand, lost contracts, investigation expenses, administration, bad morale among employees, time to attend hearings, etc.  The list goes on and on.  I would challenge those of you who have changed your culture to a safer workplace to look at your financial statements and give the credit for the improvements to the reduction of these direct and indirect costs.   For those who may struggle to get upper management to look at something besides sales, use the worksheet to show them the importance of safety and loss prevention.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
<div>By <a href="http://chrismoxley.com/">Chris L. Moxley, CIC, CRIS</a></div>
<div><a href="http://pi-ins.com/">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</a>
<p><a href="http://pi-ins.com/">Professional Insurors Agency, LLC</a></p>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Chris Moxley is the Vice-President of Operations for Professional Insurors and President of TCOR Services USA.  He earned his Certified Insurance Counselor Designation in 1995 and his Construction Risk and Insurance Specialist designation in 2005.  He is active in several industry associations and is a member of the Oklahoma State and Oklahoma City Chambers of Commerce and serves as President of the Arbor Lake HOA.  With over 20 years&rsquo; experience in the industry, Chris serves as publisher for TCORBLOG.com and teaches classes in risk management and workers compensation.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourhrresource.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-13945426.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Employee Discipline Simplified</title><category>employee discipline</category><category>firing</category><dc:creator>Laura Moxley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 17:21:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.yourhrresource.com/blog/2011/7/1/employee-discipline-simplified.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1006113:13350721:13945425</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Should employers require steps in the disciplinary action process? First, what is disciplinary action and what does it entail? Disciplinary action is the means of communicating corrective action to an employee whenever some type of workplace infraction has occurred. Usually managers make it harder than what it has to be. This could be for many reasons; some of which may include the discomfort of having to confront the worker, fear the worker may do or say something and the manager will not know how to respond or react; or perhaps the manager doesn’t want to take the time to find and replace a worker that needs replacing so they keep the employee longer than they should. Also, some managers may be under the impression they first must issue warnings before they can fire an employee. These are all valid concerns and most can effectively be addressed with training.</p><p>While there are many great places to work, ultimately a manager will be faced with having to impose some type of disciplinary action on a worker so it is important to understand the best practices. On occasion, an employee may violate a policy or workplace standard, display poor performance or misconduct. It could be worse, and some form of discrimination, harassment, retaliation, safety violation, or gross negligence and/or misconduct could have occurred. Unfortunately, disciplining employees is part of what supervisors and managers sometimes have to do. So, should there be steps? We said in the beginning that disciplinary action was a means to correct behavior or performance; to inform the employee of the minimal expectations for improvement so he/she has a chance to save his/her job. If we want to give chances, it seems logical to inform an employee this is his/her first strike; and sometimes second chances are warranted. However, some managers loosely say three strikes and you’re out; even going so far as to broadcast and put in written policies that an employee will first receive a verbal warning, then a written warning, and after three written warnings, they will be fired.</p><p>Having steps in the disciplinary action process is not a good idea because it takes away the employer’s authority to take appropriate action at its sole discretion, given the offense. How? Very simply, if an employer’s policies state an employee must receive three warnings before being fired, and some type of gross misconduct occurs, it will be more risky for the employer to fire that employee. It is much better for an Employee Discipline Policy to state the employer can take whatever disciplinary action it deems appropriate given the infraction. The types of disciplinary action include: verbal warning, written warning, suspension (paid or not paid) and termination but in no particular order. Implementing disciplinary action in this way, the employer can reduce liability associated with wrongful termination claims. It is then important to train managers on these practices and company policies.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourhrresource.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-13945425.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Independent Contractor or Employee?</title><dc:creator>Laura Moxley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.yourhrresource.com/blog/2011/4/25/independent-contractor-or-employee.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1006113:13350721:13945424</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>How do you know if the person you hire should be classified as an independent contractor or employee? Does it really matter? After all, he/she is performing a service and you are paying for the service. Oh, if it were that simple. Employer liability can be great when workers are misclassified. Penalties can include years of unpaid employment taxes, workers’ compensation unpaid premiums, reimbursements for work-related expenses and potential unpaid overtime compensation, not to mention liability for not providing employee benefits such as health insurance and retirement. That said, it’s not a problem until it’s a problem, right? If you subscribe to that philosophy, keep reading…</p><p>If you hire a landscape company to maintain the perimeter of your facilities, usually they are incorporated, have workers they pay and provide benefits, including workers’ compensation insurance (by the way, you should always obtain a certificate of this insurance), perform their services for other employers, and your arrangement with them is centered on the project <em>results</em>. In other words, you are not giving them <em>details</em> of <em>how</em> to do the work. If you hired an individual to perform this same service, the relationship could change…</p><p>The relationship between the company and the individual worker is central to determine if the person is an employee or independent contractor. Generally, if the company controls <em>what</em> will be done and <em>how</em> it will be done, the worker is an employee. Independent contractors have greater control over their work. Usually the work is project based with emphasis on a particular trade or subject matter that individual is specialized in.</p><p>The IRS has identified 3 categories to assist employers in the relationship analysis: <strong>behavioral control, financial control, and type of relationship</strong>.</p><p><strong>Behavioral</strong> considerations <em>(an individual is subject to the employer’s instructions)</em>:</p><p>• When, where, and how to work <em>(must they adhere to the employer’s set schedule?)<br/></em>• What tools or equipment to use <em>(does the employer provide the tools?)<br/></em>• What workers to hire or to assist with the work <em>(does the employer dictate this?)<br/></em>• Where to purchase supplies and services <em>(does the employer or worker supply materials?)<br/></em>• What work must be performed by a specified individual <em>(who is supervising delegated tasks?)<br/></em>• What order or sequence to follow<em> (does the employer provide instructions?)</p><p></em><strong>Financial </strong>considerations <em>(right to control the business aspects of a worker’s job)</em>:</p><p>• The extent to which the worker has unreimbursed expenses <em>(are there fixed, on-going costs for the worker?)<br/></em>• The extent of the worker’s investment <em>(is the worker responsible for their own supplies and labor costs?)<br/></em>• The extent to which the worker makes services available to the relevant market<em> (does the worker promote/contract his/her skills/services to other employers?)<br/></em>• How the business pays the worker <em>(Is the pay on a project basis? Hourly basis?)<br/></em>• The extent to which the worker can realize a profit or loss<em> (does the individual have the ability to make a profit or loss?)</p><p></em><strong>Type of relationship</strong> <em>(define the relationship between the employer and worker)</em>:</p><p>• Written contracts describing the relationship the parties intended to create <em>(does a contract agreement exist between the parties?)<br/></em>• Whether the worker is provided with employee-type benefits <em>(is the worker provided access to benefits otherwise reserved for employees such has health insurance, retirement, etc.?)<br/></em>• The permanency of the relationship <em>(is the work performed indefinitely rather than a specific period?)<br/></em>• How integral the services are to the principal activity <em>(are the services performed an integral part of the business?)</p><p></em>In addition, the IRS developed its <strong>20-Factor Test</strong> to assist employers in determining classification. While no one factor is more indicative of status than another, a high number of “yes” answers could indicate an employment relationship.</p><p><strong>IRS</strong> <strong>20-Factors</strong> (Circle YES or NO for each)</p><p>1. <strong>Instructions:</strong> Is the worker required to comply with employer’s instructions about when, where, and how to work? <strong>YES NO </strong></p><p>2. <strong>Training:</strong> Is training required? Does the worker receive training from or at the direction of the employer, includes attending meetings and working with experienced employees? <strong>YES NO</strong></p><p>3. <strong>Integration:</strong> Are the worker’s services integrated with activities of the company? Does the success of the employer’s business significantly depend upon the performance of services that the worker provides? <strong>YES NO<br/></strong><br/>4. <strong>Services Rendered Personally:</strong> Is the worker required to perform the work personally? <strong>YES NO </strong></p><p>5. <strong>Authority to hire, supervise and pay assistants:</strong> Does the worker have the ability to hire, supervise and pay assistants for the employer? <strong>YES NO </strong></p><p>6. <strong>Continuing Relationship:</strong> Does the worker have a continuing relationship with the employer? <strong>YES NO<br/></strong><br/>7. <strong>Set Hours of Work:</strong> Is the worker required to follow set hours of work? <strong>YES NO </strong></p><p>8. <strong>Full-time Work Required:</strong> Does the worker work full-time for the employer? <strong>YES NO </strong></p><p>9. <strong>Place of Work:</strong> Does the worker perform work on the employer’s premises and use the company’s office equipment? <strong>YES NO<br/></strong><br/>10. <strong>Sequence of Work:</strong> Does the worker perform work in a sequence set by the employer? Does the worker follow a set schedule? <strong>YES NO </strong></p><p>11. <strong>Reporting Obligations:</strong> Does the worker submit regular written or oral reports to the employer? <strong>YES NO </strong></p><p>12. <strong>Method of Payment:</strong> How does the worker receive payments? Are there payments of regular amounts at set intervals? <strong>YES NO </strong></p><p>13. <strong>Payment of Business and Travel Expenses:</strong> Does the worker receive payment for business and travel expenses? <strong>YES NO<br/></strong><br/>14. <strong>Furnishing of tools and materials:</strong> Does the worker rely on the employer for tools and materials? <strong>YES NO </strong></p><p>15. <strong>Investment:</strong> Has the worker made an investment in the facilities or equipment used to perform services? <strong>YES NO </strong></p><p>16. <strong>Risk of Loss:</strong> Is the payment made to the worker on a fixed basis regardless of profitability or loss? <strong>YES NO </strong></p><p>17. <strong>Working for more than one company at a time:</strong> Does the worker only work for one employer at a time? <strong>YES NO<br/></strong><br/>18. <strong>Availability of services to the general public:</strong> Are the services offered to the employer unavailable to the general public? <strong>YES NO<br/></strong><br/>19.<strong> Right to discharge:</strong> Can the worker be fired by the employer? <strong>YES NO<br/></strong><br/>20. <strong>Right to quit:</strong> Can the worker quit work at any time without liability? <strong>YES NO<br/></strong><br/>The IRS has announced it will be conducting thousands of random audits over the next 3 years. Therefore, it is important to be proactive and perform the above self-audits per individual case; then make internal corrections where necessary and remember, err on the side of caution when uncertain. <a href="http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p15a.pdf">Click here for more information</a>.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourhrresource.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-13945424.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Inclement Weather - To Pay or Not to Pay</title><dc:creator>Laura Moxley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.yourhrresource.com/blog/2011/2/3/inclement-weather-to-pay-or-not-to-pay.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1006113:13350721:13945423</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>With the recent storms that swept the nation, many employers were forced to close their operations for one day, if not a few days depending on their region of the country. Some employers do a good job of communicating office closures to their personnel while others...not so much. One fundamental fact is that several employers are faced with determining compensation for employees for the days missed due to inclement weather. Employers should always first turn to applicable federal and state laws, as well as their company policies, to guide them. Within the scope of this article, it is not possible to explore every state law or every employer's policy should they even have one. Therefore, keep the following tips in mind when you are deciding - to pay or not to pay:</p><p>1. Decide if the company is (was) officially open or closed for business.</p><p>2. If officially open, that means employees are expected to be at work for their regularly scheduled time. If an employee does <strong>not</strong> come to work, that employee should use available vacation or sick time, providing the company has such policies; otherwise the time will be unpaid.</p><p>   a. Exempt employees (those not eligible for overtime compensation) should be deducted in full-day increments. If they work any part of the day, however, they must be paid for the full day. Otherwise, you will be in jeopardy of losing the exempt status for that employee.</p><p>   b. Non-exempt employees should be deducted for the amount of time actually missed from their regularly scheduled workshift. If they work any part of the day, they should be compensated for only those hours actually worked.</p><p>3. If officially closed, that means most employees are not expected to arrive at work. I say "most" because some employees go to work anyway, especially if they live close by, have a key to the building and there are no other restrictions placed upon them from working - usually these will be key employees or exempt employees and it also depends on the industry, type of work, security measures, etc. If work is performed by an employee, the above rules apply.</p><p>4. Where officially closed, and <strong>no work is performed</strong>, a company may advise employees they will have to use available vacation or sick leave if available. Where no benefit is available, employers <strong>may not</strong> <strong>deduct </strong>the pay of exempt employees but <strong>may deduct</strong> the pay of non-exempt employees for the actual time missed.</p><p>5. That said, here are <strong>best practices</strong> for when the<em> <strong>office is officially closed and no work is performed</strong></em> by either exempt or non-exempt employees:</p><p>   a. Exempt employees should be paid for the full day.</p><p>   b. Non-exempt employees should be paid for the actual shift hours they missed due to the company officially closing its doors.</p><p>You may wonder why not make them use available vacation and sick leave; after all no production occured while the office was closed yet we have this payroll expense and nothing to offset it. That is a fair question when considered at face value. However, consider also the employee did not request this time off; consider the inclement weather was not within anyone's control; consider the office being officially closed was a decision made by the employer for safety concerns and to make an employee use available vacation and sick leave on top of that seems like a form of punishment; consider the morale of your workforce and the workplace standards your company strives to uphold and the extent to which you rely on your employees to do their part in this effort. The benefits of paying your employees far outweigh not paying them when considering these factors.</p><p>It is safe to say an employee who believes a company, no matter its size, takes their welfare into consideration is an employee who, more times than not, can be retained.</p><p>I hope everyone was as safe and snug as possible during this recent snowstorm. More information can be found at <a href="http://www.dol.gov/">www.dol.gov</a>.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourhrresource.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-13945423.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>The I-9 is Not That Hard</title><category>I-9</category><dc:creator>Laura Moxley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.yourhrresource.com/blog/2011/1/16/the-i-9-is-not-that-hard.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1006113:13350721:13945422</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Many employers struggle with the I-9. While there are a few complexities, it should be a relatively simple process for completing, storing, and tracking. I have performed several I-9 and Employee File Audits and have found the same mistakes among employers. Usually, forms are not stored properly, are missing key information such as signatures, hire dates and, yes, even the fields where document information must be listed are blank! Another common mistake is not dating the I-9 within 3 business days of employment and, sometimes, an employer won’t even have an I-9 for an employee at all!</p><p>The Act regulating I-9s is the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA). In a nutshell, it prohibits the employment of individuals who are not legally authorized to work in the United States. It also prohibits discrimination in employment related matters on the basis of national origin or citizenship. You cannot fail to hire someone because he/she is NOT a citizen. IRCA requires employers to certify the identity and eligibility to work within 3 business days of employment using the I-9 form.</p><p>The I-9 does a good job of giving instruction on how to complete it. I think several employers simply do not take the time. This is a good first step. Read the instructions on the form itself. Be sure that you are using the correct form with the latest document number and expiration date. As of now, that date is “OMB No. 1615-0047; Expires 08/31/12”.</p><p>I have provided 10 steps for you to use as a cheat sheet. Keep this in your desk to refer to:</p><p>1. All employees must complete an I-9. They cannot complete it until AFTER they have received a conditional offer of employment. Use an Offer Letter to document this was the case.</p><p>2. The I-9 must be completed AND dated within 3 business days after the employee’s hire date. If an employer wants an employee to complete hiring forms PRIOR to their start date, this is okay AS LONG AS a conditional Offer Letter has been extended and accepted by the employee.</p><p>3. The employer must examine the original documents, not photo copies, to ascertain if they are genuine.</p><p>4. The employer cannot TELL the employee WHAT documents to bring for examination. A list of documents is provided on the I-9. Give this list to the employee so they can choose what documents they have that satisfy the requirements.</p><p>5. All documents must be UNEXPIRED!</p><p>6. Section 1 is completed by the employee and signed and dated.</p><p>7. Section 2 is completed by the employer and signed and dated. This should be the SAME person who examined the original documents. Within the “Certification” paragraph, there is a blank line to insert the employee’s hire date. This is often left blank. Be sure to complete this and ensure it is the correct hire date that was used on the Offer Letter.</p><p>8. Section 3 is ONLY for RE-verification so this is left blank UNTIL it is time to RE-verify the employee’s documents. You should have some type of tickler/reminder system in place for I-9 re-verifications. Every document must maintain an unexpired date now, including Driver’s Licenses.</p><p>9. Store the I-9s separate from the Personnel Files. A binder is a good method. Use alphabetical dividers for organization. Keep the binders locked. Electronic storage and signatures are allowed.</p><p>10. The retention for I-9s is the duration of employment PLUS one year OR 3 years from the date of hire, whichever is longer. It is not necessary to keep I-9s beyond the retention period.</p><p>IRCA imposes fines for hiring illegal aliens ranging from $275-$11,000 per alien. There are also paperwork fines between $110-$1,100 per offense. Finally, employers can even face criminal penalties for repeated violations. These can include up to 6 months in prison and up to $3,000 per unauthorized alien! So, I tell you, the relative simplicity of maintaining the I-9 form is not worth facing any of these penalties! If you find errors on an I-9, these can be corrected by lining through the mistake and initialing the correction beside it. If the I-9 is really messed up, have the employee complete a new one with current dates but staple the incorrect I-9 to the back of this and store them together.</p><p>Once you get your system in place and train your staff, you will see the process is easy to maintain. More information, including a Handbook for Employers, can be found at <a href="http://www.uscis.gov/">www.uscis.gov</a>.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourhrresource.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-13945422.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Insurance Verification System Goes Online</title><dc:creator>Laura Moxley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.yourhrresource.com/blog/2009/7/9/insurance-verification-system-goes-online.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1006113:13350721:13945420</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>DPS and the tag agents have begun enforcing the new law which became effective 1/1/09. They have been giving some time for companies to get their data loaded into the systems. The card should show the name of the insurance company, NAIC code of the company (not the company group), policy number, effective date, expiration date, insured's name, vehicle year, make, model, and serial number, agency name, address, and phone number. The policy number, NAIC code, and vehicle serial number need to all match or the card will be rejected. The company's are supposed to have the data entered into the system within 48 hours of receiving an endorsement to add a new vehicle.</p><p>There are several stories in today's papers on this issue:</p><p><strong>Journal Record: Insurance verification system in place July 9, 2009</strong></p><p>OKLAHOMA CITY - Oklahoma's new electronic verification system for vehicle insurance is now online and fully operational.</p><p>Oklahoma Tax Commission spokeswoman Paula Ross said validating insurance electronically gives immediate confirmation that a driver has a valid policy.</p><p>The system is designed to help law enforcement keep uninsured motorists off Oklahoma roads. It will be used by the Department of Public Safety, tag agents and the Tax Commission.</p><p>Motorists still will need to present an insurance verification card when renewing their vehicle registrations. Information on the card will be entered into an online database, which is then matched up to verify the policy is valid and current.</p><p>Ross says if the information is not current or cannot be confirmed in the database, then registration will not be issued.</p><p><strong>Tulsa World: New system IDs auto insurance scofflaws</strong></p><p>by: BARBARA HOBEROCK World Capitol Bureau Thursday, July 09, 2009</p><p>OKLAHOMA CITY - Law enforcement officers and tag agents are using an online verification system to crack down on drivers without insurance.</p><p>The system, which was created by a 2006 law, has been in testing since October, Oklahoma Tax Commission spokeswoman Paula Ross said.</p><p>Tag agents began using the system Wednesday to verify that people who are seeking to renew their tags and register vehicles have the required insurance, she said.</p><p>Ross said some people buy insurance to renew a vehicle tag and then cancel the insurance after they receive the security verification form.</p><p>People renewing a tag still will have to present insurance verification, Ross said. If the insurance coverage is not current, the tag will be denied.</p><p>Source: <a href="http://www.iiaok.com/">www.iiaok.com</a></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourhrresource.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-13945420.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Minimum Wage Increase on the Horizon</title><dc:creator>Laura Moxley</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.yourhrresource.com/blog/2009/7/7/minimum-wage-increase-on-the-horizon.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">1006113:13350721:13945421</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>The federal minimum wage will increase to $7.25 per hour effective July 24, 2009 as amended in the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Employers should check the wages of all your non-exempt employees to ensure that they will meet or exceed the new rate prior to July 24, 2009. This is also a good time to review the exempt/non-exempt statuses of your employees.</p><p>If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or you can get more information at the U.S. Department of Labor website: <a href="http://www.dol.gov/esa/whd/flsa/#assessmenttool">http://www.dol.gov/esa/whd/flsa/#assessmenttool</a></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.yourhrresource.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-13945421.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>